Suspected drunken drivers do not have the right to choose which type of blood-alcohol test they get, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday, settling the case of a Kingston-based attorney accused of driving drunk. The high court upheld a Commonwealth Court ruling from August 2014 that held John D. Nardone, 56, of Shavertown, had refused to submit to a chemical test, even though he claimed to be willing to submit to both a urine and breath test.
↧
